Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Shankar Unni <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file
Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:00:59 -0700
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<bg914i$v5j$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<03C99898510C8C47945B932907D99AAA16EC56 AT E2KMEMMCS1 DOT ftbco DOT ftn DOT com> <006a01c3561c$b44f1320$9901020a AT api360 DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact)
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
In-Reply-To:	<006a01c3561c$b44f1320$9901020a@api360.net>

Lisbeth Kellogg wrote:
> Yes.  Now I get the same thing.  But why don't I have to do it that way
> in XP?

It's nothing to do with the OS or Bill Gates' conspiracies.

Consider the two *machines* as distinct entities, and examine their
configurations (all environment variables, all .rc scripts) to see
what's different between the two.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -