Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject:	Re: apache problems gone with 1.50
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:50:28 -0700
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<bg6tnd$q5i$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<NDBBLLFMLFMANIDPNADCMEJNFCAA DOT wpmccormick AT covad DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en, zh
In-Reply-To:	<NDBBLLFMLFMANIDPNADCMEJNFCAA.wpmccormick@covad.net>

Bill McCormick wrote:

> I installed cygwin 1.50 and my apache problems have ceased.

This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> 
Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site 
over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I 
do have a friend who wishes to host his web site on a Windows box and I 
am contemplating using Cygwin for most services. If Apache under Cygwin 
works well with 1.5.0 then perhaps I'll just go that way. I wonder if 
anybody has measured the speed difference between Apache for Windows and 
Apache under Cygwin...



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -