delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <antoine AT antbuild DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: cut and paste problem with xemacs Was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Available for test: cygwin-1.5.0-1 |
Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:02:29 +0200 |
Lines: | 29 |
Message-ID: | <bfrunc$kjh$1@main.gmane.org> |
References: | <20030710041843 DOT C29AA6C594 AT redhat DOT com><bfhc7h$v12$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <16156 DOT 22413 DOT 865281 DOT 664360 AT phish DOT entomo DOT com> <008401c34fcf$7d9cd2c0$020200c0 AT DJ0X820J> <3F1C6B26 DOT B4EA0216 AT acm DOT org> <bfp25g$c5$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3F2011BD DOT E699303 AT acm DOT org> |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 |
David Rothenberger wrote : >Any suggestions would be appreciated, even if its just "try looking at >somefile.c". I don't mind investigation and can go with limited info; >I'm just out of ideas now. One idea would be to look at the source code of xemacs. I presume that the copy and paste functions of xemacs (key combinations Esc-W and C-y) are lisp functions which call directly or indirectly C API functions. Looking at these function calls would begin to shed light on the problem. The other question on the cygwin side : what is the official or recommended way of accessing the cut and paste buffer for an application written in C (xemacs) and running under Windows+cygwin. When we will have answers to both these questions, we can determine whether : - xemacs was using an undocumented feature of cygwin to interact with the Windows cut and paste buffer, or whether the official cygwin API has changed, - other option : to the contrary, xemacs is programmed properly and there has been a mistake in the code changes done in cygwin between 1.3.x and 1.5 I would be delighted to help, but I am busy at the moment, so I do not make any promise. Cheers, Antoine -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |