Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: DLL 1.3.22 - etags 5.5.4 fails on XP Pro
References:	<usmoxjbsc DOT fsf AT softechnics DOT com>
	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0307231838150 DOT 26427-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
From:	jeff DOT rancier AT softechnics DOT com (Jeffery B. Rancier)
Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:13:05 -0400
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0307231838150.26427-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> (Igor
	Pechtchanski's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:40:38 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID:	<u8yqn20xq.fsf@softechnics.com>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> writes:

> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jeffery B. Rancier wrote:
>
>> Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com> writes:
>>
>> > It's not a bug, unless you consider a Windows program not being able to
>> > understand Cygwin symbolic links a bug.  I don't think there is much
>> > chance of changing Windows to permit all applications a proper understanding
>> > though.
>>
>> I see.  Why does it work at all, then?  I renamed my emacs version of
>> etags to ensure that I was running cygwin's.
>>
>> > I'm surprised you don't see this all of the time when invoked in NTEmacs.
>> > Regardless, it would never work, even if it doesn't complain.  Use
>> > Cygwin's emacs, ctags directly, or some emacs lisp wizardry to resolve
>> > this issue.
>>
>> First time I've ever seen it is three years.
>
> What you could do is create an "etags.bat" that runs 'bash -c etags "%1"
> "%2" "%3" "%4" "%5" "%6" "%7" "%8" "%9"', put it in your PATH, and you
> should be able to call that from NTEmacs.
> 	Igor

[...]

Thanks Igor,

On a related note, in the 5.5.4 version of ctags, I can't seem to get the 'recurse' option to do anything useful.  

bash-2.05b$ ctags -e -R *.c *.h 

only includes the C source and headers in the current working directory.  Is this broken?

Jeff


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -