Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/07/24/09:13:08
do any of the cygwin Libraries have a signal function?
If so does the cygwin singal function handle the signal values
SIGABRT Abnormal termination
SIGFPE Floating-point error
SIGILL Illegal instruction
SIGINT CTRL+C signal
SIGSEGV Illegal storage access
SIGTERM Termination request
Besides opening and closing the windows I sincerely doubt cygwin is sending
or receiving any window events..
Something to think about..
-Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Sharp" <david DOT m DOT sharp AT btopenworld DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: How to diagnose Cygwin / Windows shutdown problem
> I don't know for sure either, but by the end of a day, it is not unusual
> for me to see multiple instances of bash.exe within my task manager,
> despite having closed them in windows. Therefore I don't think there is
> windows->posix signal translation, just the other way around.
>
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> >There is such a mechanism on Win2k. I don't think there is one on Win9x.
> >This thread seems to indicate that there isn't one on WinXP, either, at
> >least not for shutdown messages.
> > Igor
> >
> >On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Andrew,
> >>>
> >>>Cygwin apps don't have a Windows event handler do they?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>To tell you the truth... I don't know for sure.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>The two programming models (Win32 and POSIX) are fundamentally
> >>>different, so based on my very limited understanding, it seems that
> >>>Cygwin itself (code in Cygwin1.dll) would have to intercept these
> >>>OS-generated events and translate them into POSIX signals (SIGUP, say).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Makes sense to me! I would suspect that when one clicks on the close
> >>button in the window frame that generates a Windows event that is
> >>translated somehow to send a kill signal to the shell. If true then
> >>there is already a mechanism for Win Event -> POSIX signal.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Randall Schulz
> >>>
> >>>At 17:16 2003-07-23, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Cygwin apps don't know about and cannot respond to the
> >>>>>system-generated messages that request that applications quit in
> >>>>>preparation for the system to shut down or the user to log off.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>"Cannot respond to"? When a system-generated message that requests
> >>>>that applications quit in preparation for the systme to shut down or
> >>>>the user to log off why can Cygwin apps (in particular bash or other
> >>>>shell) simply do what it would have done if TMOUT was just triggered?
> >>>>
> >>>> TMOUT If set to a value greater than zero, TMOUT is treated
> >>>>as the
> >>>> default timeout for the read builtin. The select
> >>>>command termi-
> >>>> nates if input does not arrive after TMOUT seconds when
> >>>>input is
> >>>> coming from a terminal. In an interactive shell, the
> >>>>value is
> >>>> interpreted as the number of seconds to wait for
> >>>>input after
> >>>> issuing the primary prompt. Bash terminates after
> >>>>waiting for
> >>>> that number of seconds if input does not arrive.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -