| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:52:55 +1000 (EST) |
| From: | luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au |
| Subject: | How to tell if ntsec is on or off |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| In-Reply-To: | <20030723052413.CDF5034903@nevin.research.canon.com.au> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Message-Id: | <20030723055255.B0D3634903@nevin.research.canon.com.au> |
On 23 Jul, I wrote:
> I was going to qualify this with `when ntsec is defined in CYGWIN'
It's not easy to find out if ntsec is turned on, is it? When I wrote
the above, I was thinking "ntsec turned on" means $CYGWIN includes the
word "ntsec".
But I think I've just realised that isn't true, is it?
If it's pre Cygwin 1.3.something-like-18, then it's on if and only if
ntsec is in $CYGWIN, but if it's after, it's on unless $CYGWIN includes
nontsec. So the actual test you'd have to make would be something like
what I've written here (read "~" as "includes"):
version < 1.3.18 then $CYGWIN ~ \<ntsec else !( $CYGWIN ~ nontsec )
luke
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |