Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/07/22/22:55:21
Chris,
At 18:29 2003-07-22, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:23:13PM -0400, David A. Cobb wrote:
> >Recently, I was trying to do "strace Xemacs . . ."
> >First I got a "No such file" error, so I changed to do "strace `which
> >xemacs` " -- still a failure.
> >
> >which xemacs returns "/usr/local/bin/xemacs.exe.lnk"; that is, my normal
> >handle to launch xemacs is a symlink to the executable whose name or
> >location varies with the version-number.
> >
> >Given that its purpose is to locate what executable file one will use in
> >a particular environment, should not 'which' resolve the symlink and
> >return its target?
>
>No.
>
> >What would happen on *nix?
>
>The same thing as on cygwin.
Really?
Since Cygwin "strace" is not a Cygwin program, it does not get Cygwin
symbolic links resolved. Whereas on Unix or Linux, a symlink would be
resolved by the kernel if it was used by strace and it (strace) would
successfully get its target executed.
So wouldn't the behavior on Cygwin differ from a comparable invocation
on Linux or Unix?
Randall Schulz
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -