Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/07/22/17:27:25
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 04:41:18PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
>> * In message <20030722172316 DOT GC17916 AT redhat DOT com>
>> * On the subject of "Re: subprocess i/o interaction with shell (bash&cmd): shells compete for input with user program!"
>> * Sent on Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:23:16 -0400
>> * Honorable Christopher Faylor <cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com> writes:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:23:18PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
>> >> Under cygwin you'd accomplish this by having the parent process use
>> >> one of the "exec" calls.
>> >
>> >nope. doesn't work either.
>> >I get the same "input competition" when I use exec().
>>
>> If you are using fork/exec, then sure, you'll get that.
>
>I am not using fork(). just plain exec().
Ok. Then you're not building cygwin applications apparently. Next
assumption is that you're using the -mno-cygwin option.
If the exec paradigm in cygwin was really broken, the mailing list would
be filled with people complaining about that fact.
cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -