Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Info:	This message was accepted for relay by
	smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication
X-Trace:	UmFuZG9tSVZq5sDWMwcQuAZ6yL3GAh6qLd3rz6lqrBUVIjDStanl+/rVv5yGwgLr
Message-ID:	<3F16AF4B.7060003@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:14:35 -0400
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Pavel Rozenboim <pavelr AT coresma DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.5.0 managed mode & backward compatibility
References:	<6A3008858445D711A58A00062939B2F1EB0A AT EXCHANGE>
In-Reply-To:	<6A3008858445D711A58A00062939B2F1EB0A@EXCHANGE>

Pavel Rozenboim wrote:

> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com]
>>Sent: Wed, July 16, 2003 6:07 PM
>>To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>>Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.0 managed mode & backward compatibility
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:48:28PM +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I installed cygwin 1.5.0 and remounted all cygwin 
>>
>>directories (/,/usr/bin,
>>
>>>/usr/lib) in managed mode. Now I can't access files that 
>>
>>have a capital
>>
>>>letters that were created before upgrade to 1.5.0. 
>>
>>*exactly*
>>
>>Don't do that.  Do not use managed mode on your old 
>>directories.  It is
>>called "managed" for a reason.  Cygwin wants to manage all 
>>file creations.
>>So, the only way to use it is to create an empty directory, mount it
>>as managed, and then populate it with files.
> 
> 
> Do you have any plans to provide backward/windows compatibility for managed
> mode? 


Perhaps I'm being simplistic but I can't see how Windows compatibility
could be added in terms of it displaying the unmanaged names and
understanding which name maps where.  I assume that's what you meant.
If not, please clarify.  Also, I'm not sure I understand the implication
of 'backward' in your statement, unless it was just a qualifier for
'windows'.

There's no reason that Windows applications can't work with the managed
named files of course.  At least, no reason AFAICS.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -