Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Rolf Campbell <rcampbell AT tropicnetworks DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Anyone trying 1.5.0 for anything other than managed mode?
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:24:19 -0400
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<bf4j94$98t$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<20030716171215 DOT GA12514 AT redhat DOT com>
Reply-To:	IDontLikePersonalReplies AT hotmail DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
In-Reply-To:	<20030716171215.GA12514@redhat.com>

I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was 
released.  No problems yet.  (in fact, I notice the speed improvement 
over 1.3.22 -- you know, that sparse file thing).

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Can I take the silence on bug reports for anything other than managed
> mode as a good sign.
> 
> The list of packages built with 1.5.0 is growing.  I hope we'll see a
> list of available packages here (and maybe in cygwin-announce) we reach
> critical mass.
> 
> cgf
> --
> Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
> Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
> and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -