Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3F130C22.2030308@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:01:38 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygipc problem (was shmctl(blabla,IPC_RMID,NULL) question)
References:	<20030708185852 DOT GC496 AT tishler DOT net> <3F11B79B DOT 4020902 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20030714120812 DOT GB1268 AT tishler DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<20030714120812.GB1268@tishler.net>
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavisd-new
X-SPAM:	NO

Jason Tishler wrote:
> Chuck,
> 
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
>>However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ...
> 
>                                            ^^^^^
> 
> Is the above a typo?  Shouldn't the next version be > 1.14?  For
> example, 1.15 or 2.0.

Yep, sorry.  cygutils was bumped to 1.2.0, cygipc was bumped to 2.00.  I 
meant 2.00, of course.

--
Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -