Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:19:00 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygipc problem (was shmctl(blabla,IPC_RMID,NULL) question)
Message-ID:	<20030714181859.GA1420@tishler.net>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030714120812 DOT GB1268 AT tishler DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0307141102010 DOT 17842-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0307141102010.17842-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

Igor,

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:03:55AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > > However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc,
> >                                            ^^^^^
> > Is the above a typo?  Shouldn't the next version be > 1.14?  For
> > example, 1.15 or 2.0.
> 
> It is 2.00, according to a recent message on cygwin-apps, so the above
> is most likely a typo.

I figured out the above after reading cygwin-apps.  FWIW, I read my
mailing lists alphabetically...

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -