delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "james_lankton" <james_lankton AT yahoo DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: overcoming make in openssl |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:53:44 -0700 |
Lines: | 99 |
Message-ID: | <bdudj0$g8v$1@main.gmane.org> |
References: | <bdubhr$8as$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 55 DOT 0307021135190 DOT 2156 AT ellixia> |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 |
Thankyou Elfyn I will look for the build script its not build.sh also I was not aware of the mentioned script my fault. James "Elfyn McBratney" <elfyn AT cygwin DOT com> wrote in message news:Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 55 DOT 0307021135190 DOT 2156 AT ellixia... > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, james_lankton wrote: > > > Here are the details as requested > > > > I have configured open ssl-0.9.7b with the command ./ > > but am having a problem with the make command. > > > > > > Here is the result. > > > > > > > > Administrator AT beta ~ > > $ cd openssl-0.9.7b > > > > Administrator AT beta ~/openssl-0.9.7b > > $ make > > making all in crypto... > > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/Administrator/openssl-0.9.7b/crypto' > > cc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32 -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDS > > O_WI > > N32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i > > 486 > > -Wall -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c -o cryptlib.o cryptlib.c > > cryptlib.c:70: parse error before "IMPLEMENT_STACK_OF" > > cryptlib.c:73: warning: return type defaults to `int' > > cryptlib.c: In function `IMPLEMENT_STACK_OF': > > cryptlib.c:73: `CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS' undeclared (first use in this function) > > cryptlib.c:73: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > cryptlib.c:73: for each function it appears in.) > > cryptlib.c:73: storage class specified for parameter `lock_names' > > cryptlib.c:73: parameter `lock_names' is initialized > > cryptlib.c:76: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer > > cryptlib.c:76: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names') > > cryptlib.c:77: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer > > cryptlib.c:77: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names') > > cryptlib.c:78: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer > > cryptlib.c:78: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names') > > cryptlib.c:79: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer > > cryptlib.c:79: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names') > > cryptlib.c:80: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer > > cryptlib.c:80: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names') > > [...] > > I had a similar error this morning when I accidentially declared an array of > structs as a single struct. By the looks of it a header file isn't being > included. > > > cryptlib.c:109:3: #error "Inconsistency between crypto.h and cryptlib.c" > > cryptlib.c:115: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `STACK' > > cryptlib.c:115: storage class specified for parameter `STACK' > > cryptlib.c:115: parse error before '*' token > > cryptlib.c:115: declaration for parameter `STACK' but no such parameter > > cryptlib.c:73: declaration for parameter `lock_names' but no such parameter > > cryptlib.c:148: `app_locks' undeclared (first use in this function) > > cryptlib.c:148: warning: implicit declaration of function `sk_new_null' > > cryptlib.c:150: warning: implicit declaration of function `CRYPTOerr' > > cryptlib.c:150: `CRYPTO_F_CRYPTO_GET_NEW_LOCKID' undeclared (first use in > > this f > > unction) > > cryptlib.c:150: `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE' undeclared (first use in this > > function) > > cryptlib.c:153: warning: implicit declaration of function `BUF_strdup' > > cryptlib.c:153: `name' undeclared (first use in this function) > > cryptlib.c:153: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a > > cast > > cryptlib.c:158: warning: implicit declaration of function `sk_push' > > cryptlib.c:160: warning: implicit declaration of function `OPENSSL_free' > > cryptlib.c: In function `CRYPTO_num_locks': > > cryptlib.c:168: `CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS' undeclared (first use in this function) > > [...] > > As I think Corinna has already mentioned, there is a build script > (CYGWIN-PATCHES/build.sh ?) that Corinna uses when building the distribution. > Have you tried running that? > > Elfyn > -- > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |