delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/07/02/06:54:25

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "james_lankton" <james_lankton AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: overcoming make in openssl
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:53:44 -0700
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <bdudj0$g8v$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <bdubhr$8as$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 55 DOT 0307021135190 DOT 2156 AT ellixia>
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200

Thankyou Elfyn I will look for the build script its not
build.sh also I was not aware of the mentioned script
my fault.


James
"Elfyn McBratney" <elfyn AT cygwin DOT com> wrote in message
news:Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 55 DOT 0307021135190 DOT 2156 AT ellixia...
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, james_lankton wrote:
>
> > Here are the details as requested
> >
> > I have configured open ssl-0.9.7b with the command ./
> > but am having a problem with the make command.
> >
> >
> > Here is the result.
> >
> >
> >
> > Administrator AT beta ~
> > $ cd openssl-0.9.7b
> >
> > Administrator AT beta ~/openssl-0.9.7b
> > $ make
> > making all in crypto...
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/Administrator/openssl-0.9.7b/crypto'
> >
cc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32 -DOPENSSL_THREADS  -DDS
> > O_WI
> >
N32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i
> > 486
> > -Wall -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM   -c -o cryptlib.o cryptlib.c
> > cryptlib.c:70: parse error before "IMPLEMENT_STACK_OF"
> > cryptlib.c:73: warning: return type defaults to `int'
> > cryptlib.c: In function `IMPLEMENT_STACK_OF':
> > cryptlib.c:73: `CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
> > cryptlib.c:73: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > cryptlib.c:73: for each function it appears in.)
> > cryptlib.c:73: storage class specified for parameter `lock_names'
> > cryptlib.c:73: parameter `lock_names' is initialized
> > cryptlib.c:76: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
> > cryptlib.c:76: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names')
> > cryptlib.c:77: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
> > cryptlib.c:77: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names')
> > cryptlib.c:78: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
> > cryptlib.c:78: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names')
> > cryptlib.c:79: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
> > cryptlib.c:79: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names')
> > cryptlib.c:80: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer
> > cryptlib.c:80: warning: (near initialization for `lock_names')
> > [...]
>
> I had a similar error this morning when I accidentially declared an array
of
> structs as a single struct. By the looks of it a header file isn't being
> included.
>
> > cryptlib.c:109:3: #error "Inconsistency between crypto.h and cryptlib.c"
> > cryptlib.c:115: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of
`STACK'
> > cryptlib.c:115: storage class specified for parameter `STACK'
> > cryptlib.c:115: parse error before '*' token
> > cryptlib.c:115: declaration for parameter `STACK' but no such parameter
> > cryptlib.c:73: declaration for parameter `lock_names' but no such
parameter
> > cryptlib.c:148: `app_locks' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > cryptlib.c:148: warning: implicit declaration of function `sk_new_null'
> > cryptlib.c:150: warning: implicit declaration of function `CRYPTOerr'
> > cryptlib.c:150: `CRYPTO_F_CRYPTO_GET_NEW_LOCKID' undeclared (first use
in
> > this f
> > unction)
> > cryptlib.c:150: `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > cryptlib.c:153: warning: implicit declaration of function `BUF_strdup'
> > cryptlib.c:153: `name' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > cryptlib.c:153: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
> > cast
> > cryptlib.c:158: warning: implicit declaration of function `sk_push'
> > cryptlib.c:160: warning: implicit declaration of function `OPENSSL_free'
> > cryptlib.c: In function `CRYPTO_num_locks':
> > cryptlib.c:168: `CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS' undeclared (first use in this
function)
> > [...]
>
> As I think Corinna has already mentioned, there is a build script
> (CYGWIN-PATCHES/build.sh ?) that Corinna uses when building the
distribution.
> Have you tried running that?
>
> Elfyn
> --
>
>




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019