Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: Win2003 periodic failures
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:23:02 -0400
Message-ID:	<15850B2D5ED56040A07CC8D2F2920E3F257289@OTTAS07.ott.signiant.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Allan Yates" <allan DOT yates AT signiant DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	25 Jun 2003 17:23:03.0254 (UTC) FILETIME=[6EFC3760:01C33B3E]
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h5PIWY924167

This is definitely the string coming out. Performing a 'strings' on the
DLL shows this 'dynamically determine load address' error message,
though with a %s for the actual module name.

Win 2003 is released. If you have enough money - Microsoft will be happy
to sell it to you :)


Thanks,

Allan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:05 PM
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Win2003 periodic failures


On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:21:21PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Allan Yates wrote:
>>I have been running Cygwin on WinNT and Win2000 platforms with no
>>issues for a year or so.  I recently installed the latest (1.3.22-1)
>>version on a Win2003 machine.  Running the same code (very simple
shell
>>scripts) I am see the following error 12-25% of the time:
>>
>>couldn't dynamically determine load address for RegCreateKeyUxA'
>>(handle 0x77DA0000), Win32 error 127
>>
>>Searches of the Cygwin archive and Google came up negative.
>>
>>Has anybody seen this before?  Or is there a specific version of
Cygwin
>>for Win2003 that I haven't found yet?
>
>I think this means that RegCreateKeyUxA is no longer exported or
>supported (in Windows 2003).

I don't know why cygwin would be loading something called
RegCreateKeyUxA.  It
certainly isn't intentional.  It should be using RegCreateKeyExA.  I
can't find
any reference to the UxA version anywhere in the source.

Has Windows 2003 been officially released?  If not, this falls into the
"only works
on non-beta versions of Windows" category.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -