delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3EF76248.7050306@t-online.de> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:25:44 +0200 |
From: | =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_Sch=F6nhaber?= <mks99 AT t-online DOT de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030612 |
X-Accept-Language: | de-de, de, en-us, en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Distribute gcc minus gcj? (was Re: Questions about Cygwin's "jar" |
command) | |
References: | <026f01c339b9$769a69f0$7e0aa8c0 AT HQSHANKAR> |
In-Reply-To: | <026f01c339b9$769a69f0$7e0aa8c0@HQSHANKAR> |
Shankar Unni wrote: > Larry Hall wrote: > > >>I know I shouldn't answer a question with a question but you >>intend this to be rhetorical, right? >> >>Never mind. I'll bite. If you or someone else is interested >>in providing a gcj package, I expect Chris would work with that >>person to avoid any package clash. > > > No, that wasn't what I meant. I was simply asking if it was possible for > (and acceptable to) cgf to drop "gcj" from the gcc package. (I.e. not > provide it at all). > > What I said was that *if* there was some cygwin user who actually was going > to use gcj for something "real"(TM), they would also be able to build it for > themselves. (I.e. I'm asserting that dropping gcj is not going to cause > anyone any major heartburn). If you're using jar for something "real", it should be much easier for you to simply rm jar.exe from /usr/bin than it is for others to build gcj from scratch. I can't see any at least moderately good reason for castrating a package just to avoid a "problem" that can be solved by a simple rm or a change in PATH. Regards mks -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |