Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Info:	This message was accepted for relay by
	smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication
X-Trace:	UmFuZG9tSVaNd7NnmnysRWtNRKJramfgkomI4+ChueuYdGUVzFbYsN5SEwe9a2ZQ
Message-ID:	<3EF75042.5060104@cygwin.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:08:50 -0400
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Shankar Unni <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Distribute gcc minus gcj? (was Re: Questions about Cygwin's "jar"
	command)
References:	<026f01c339b9$769a69f0$7e0aa8c0 AT HQSHANKAR>
In-Reply-To:	<026f01c339b9$769a69f0$7e0aa8c0@HQSHANKAR>

Shankar Unni wrote:

> Larry Hall wrote:
> 
> 
>>I know I shouldn't answer a question with a question but you 
>>intend this to be rhetorical, right?
>>
>>Never mind.  I'll bite.  If you or someone else is interested 
>>in providing a gcj package, I expect Chris would work with that 
>>person to avoid any package clash.
> 
> 
> No, that wasn't what I meant. I was simply asking if it was possible for
> (and acceptable to) cgf to drop "gcj" from the gcc package. (I.e. not
> provide it at all).
> 
> What I said was that *if* there was some cygwin user who actually was going
> to use gcj for something "real"(TM), they would also be able to build it for
> themselves. (I.e. I'm asserting that dropping gcj is not going to cause
> anyone any major heartburn).


Of course, all of this is Chris's decision however, since gcj was added in
response to requests, I don't think it can be removed without some amount
of noise on this list about it's disappearence.  So I'm not sure your
assertion holds, assuming the email archives on this subject are any
inidication.  I think the logical next step would be to make gcj a
package, which is the approach Chris recommended IIRC.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -