Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Joe Buehler <jbuehler AT hekimian DOT com>
Subject:	cygipc semaphores not persistent?
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:49:30 -0400
Organization:	Spirent Communications, Inc.
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<bcsm25$vbd$1@main.gmane.org>
Reply-To:	jbuehler AT hekimian DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
X-Enigmail-Version:	0.75.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports:	pgp-inline, pgp-mime

I am attempting to use cygipc for its semaphore functionality
in porting some existing UNIX code.

It would appear that semaphores are not persistent?

The code depends on the UNIX semantic of a semaphore being a global
system object that exists regardless of whether any processes are
currently using it.

I have processes coming and going, using the semaphore to mediate
access to a disk-based queue.  I have been debugging the code,
and it appears that the semaphore is destroyed when no process has
it open?
-- 
Joe Buehler



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -