Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3EF08A1A.7030208@onevision.de>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:49:46 +0200
From:	Roland Schwingel <Roland DOT Schwingel AT onevision DOT de>
Organization:	OneVision Software AG
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language:	de, de-de, en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Testversion uploaded: bash-2.05b-10

Hi...
cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com wrote on 18.06.2003 17:34:32:

 > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:18:29PM +0200, Roland Schwingel wrote:
 > > I also tested this release (of course). I do not use textmode, neither
 > > scripts
 > > with DOS line endings but I created one and can verify this as well..
 > >
 > > Nevertheless, I want to mention that the speed gain brought by this
 > > version is more
 > > then noticable... I have one which runs normally about 5 Minutes, 
no in
 > > less then 1(!)
 >
 > If you have the choice between speed and correctness, which one do
 > you choose?
Correctness of course!
But maybe the patch should be improved to not show these bad effects.
I try to get some time next week and see whether I can understand bash

Roland



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -