Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 7 Jun 2003 19:40:11 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Ian Johnson <icj AT primus DOT ca>
Subject:	Re: [postmaster AT sources DOT redhat DOT com] This is all very silly...
Message-ID:	<20030607234011.GA31462@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Ian Johnson <icj AT primus DOT ca>
References:	<000201c32d1a$7682a960$15a25ad1 AT Ian> <20030607183129 DOT GA26572 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030607183129.GA26572@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:31:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>[reply-to set to cygwin SPLAT cygwin]
>On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:29:20AM -0700, Ian Johnson wrote:
>>...do you want people to use cygwin or not?
>>So off I go looking for the sources to compile and lo and behold I find
>>a link ( http://cygwin.com/packages/ ) to what I think should be the
>>source for the man package and what do I get:
>
>You are either confused about the term "source code" or you are unable to
>determine what "source code" is.  This *is* the listing for the source
>code.
>
>>    man: Man, apropos and whatis (source code)
>>    Mon Dec 16 17:16:05 2002          17982 man-1.5j-2/COPYING
>>    Mon Dec 16 17:16:05 2002            807 man-1.5j-2/HISTORY
>>    Mon Dec 16 17:16:05 2002           2861 man-1.5j-2/INSTALL
>>    Mon Dec 16 17:16:05 2002            990 man-1.5j-2/LSM
>>    Mon Dec 16 17:16:06 2002           2357 man-1.5j-2/Makefile
>>    Mon Dec 16 17:16:05 2002           2365 man-1.5j-2/Makefile.in
>
>>BUT KNOW SOURCE CODE.  What is up with that?

I wanted to apologize for *my* cluelessness here.  The original poster
was looking for source code and knew what source code was. I ass*u*me*d
that he didn't.  I was completely wrong in my interpretation of this
part of his message.

To answer this question: the source code is downloadable via setup.exe
or from the mirror sites.

cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -