Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/06/04/14:34:33
I will now put myself in the corner for one hour for failing to read the
directions. :) Sorry, won't happen again. At least it is also on the list.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:40 pm
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: Possible problem with ctags
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:03:43PM +0000, Ross Presser wrote:
> >[posted and mailed to Simon Liddington <simon DOT liddington AT tait DOT co DOT nz>]
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> See: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -
>
> Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a cygwin
> developer or package maintainer?
>
> Isn't personal email more efficient than using a
> mailing list? or
> I don't want to bother the list with my problem. or
> I'm not really sure if this is a real problem and want
> to find out before I bother the list.
>
> >Exuberant Ctags 5.5, Copyright (C) 1996-2003 Darren Hiebert
> > Compiled: Apr 14 2003, 10:16:41
> > Addresses: <dhiebert AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>,
> > http://ctags.sourceforge.net
> > Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex, +internal-sort
> >
> >(By the way, although this version announces itself as 5.5,
> it is really
> >5.5.3 according to /setup.exe.)
>
> According to setup.exe, it's 5.5-3. The -3 is the cygwin
> release number which
> is not reflected in the version.
>
> cgf
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -