Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: behaviour of "for (( exp1; exp2; exp3 )); do COMMANDS; done"
References:	<002901c32427$2e1553e0$78d96f83 AT pomello>
	<PHENJGDFMJPEBOBLGEMOKENMCBAA DOT peter DOT oosterlynck AT oracle DOT com>
	<ocj6dvc16hc7e702hhe1dktohpm1306oi6 AT 4ax DOT com>
	<20030527120718 DOT GA22030 AT convex DOT org DOT uk>
	<eq29dvgfdunpptfj4ak084g2lfa22as6m1 AT 4ax DOT com>
From:	Harald DOT Maier DOT BW AT t-online DOT de (Harald Maier)
Reply-To:	Harald Maier <maierh AT myself DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2003 13:28:43 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<eq29dvgfdunpptfj4ak084g2lfa22as6m1@4ax.com> (Sam Edge's
	message of "Wed, 28 May 2003 11:17:02 +0100")
Message-ID:	<m3brxn1f9w.fsf@ate.maierh>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Sender:	320041125923-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net

Sam Edge <sam DOT edgeZZZ AT lineone DOT net> writes:

> Stuart Brady <stuart AT convex DOT org DOT uk> wrote in
> <20030527120718 DOT GA22030 AT convex DOT org DOT uk>
> in gmane.os.cygwin on Tue, 27 May 2003 13:07:18 +0100:
>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:42:21PM +0100, Sam Edge wrote:
>> > Make sure that if your script uses Bash-specific features, it starts
>> > with #!/bin/bash and not with #!/bin/sh. That way it'll work anywhere.
>> 
>> You've made the assumption that bash is always in /bin. I've seen it
>> in /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, /usr/contrib/bin, and /opt/bash/bin.
>> ~/bin would be another likely place for it.
>
> I just _knew_ I shouldn't have said "anywhere." ;-)
>
> Unfortunately this is a general weakness in the "#!/xxxx" syntax.
>
> (OT) Does anyone know if any of the common shells, when they see
> "#!/bin/xxxx" at the front of a script, try a $PATH search for an
> "xxxx" executable if they can't find "/bin/xxxx"? This would seem like
> a good idea to me.

Some people are using the env program to use the PATH environment:

#! /usr/bin/env perl
BEGIN { $^W = 1 }

Harald


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -