| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | Sam Edge <sam DOT edgeZZZ AT lineone DOT net> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: behaviour of "for (( exp1; exp2; exp3 )); do COMMANDS; done" |
| Date: | Wed, 28 May 2003 11:17:02 +0100 |
| Organization: | . |
| Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <eq29dvgfdunpptfj4ak084g2lfa22as6m1@4ax.com> |
| References: | <002901c32427$2e1553e0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <PHENJGDFMJPEBOBLGEMOKENMCBAA DOT peter DOT oosterlynck AT oracle DOT com> <ocj6dvc16hc7e702hhe1dktohpm1306oi6 AT 4ax DOT com> <20030527120718 DOT GA22030 AT convex DOT org DOT uk> |
| In-Reply-To: | <20030527120718.GA22030@convex.org.uk> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Posting-Agent: | Hamster/2.0.0.1 |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h4SAJBi15773 |
Stuart Brady <stuart AT convex DOT org DOT uk> wrote in <20030527120718 DOT GA22030 AT convex DOT org DOT uk> in gmane.os.cygwin on Tue, 27 May 2003 13:07:18 +0100: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:42:21PM +0100, Sam Edge wrote: > > Make sure that if your script uses Bash-specific features, it starts > > with #!/bin/bash and not with #!/bin/sh. That way it'll work anywhere. > > You've made the assumption that bash is always in /bin. I've seen it > in /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, /usr/contrib/bin, and /opt/bash/bin. > ~/bin would be another likely place for it. I just _knew_ I shouldn't have said "anywhere." ;-) Unfortunately this is a general weakness in the "#!/xxxx" syntax. (OT) Does anyone know if any of the common shells, when they see "#!/bin/xxxx" at the front of a script, try a $PATH search for an "xxxx" executable if they can't find "/bin/xxxx"? This would seem like a good idea to me. Regards, -- Sam Edge -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |