Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Question about "rexec"
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2003 16:45:48 -0700
Lines:	36
Message-ID:	<bb0t5c$g01$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<OF7733B313 DOT 5DACF56D-ON88256D2D DOT 0074D1D5 AT ds-us DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0305211929530 DOT 26639-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <bajdmg$mm5$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <000901c320a7$011f94a0$6400a8c0 AT FoxtrotTech0001> <001b01c320a7$b299d880$6400a8c0 AT FoxtrotTech0001> <bajj1g$qdk$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <007401c320b5$d4f5bdf0$6400a8c0 AT FoxtrotTech0001> <bajpin$lt3$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3ECD6BA5 DOT 7020902 AT rfk DOT com> <balmed$u7f$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <00fd01c32157$49817c80$78d96f83 AT pomello> <bb0q4l$3p5$2 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <063c01c324a4$b80ca9e0$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030515 Thunderbird/0.1a
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
In-Reply-To:	<063c01c324a4$b80ca9e0$78d96f83@pomello>

Max Bowsher wrote:

>Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>  
>
>>Max Bowsher wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>All that this says is to insure that you have ntsec set. I have it set.
>>>>chmod still doesn't work! BTW I'm on Windows XP and use NTFS. My home
>>>>directory is on the server (/us is a mount of //<server>/<share>).
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Aha! Then have a look at smbntsec.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Again, I'm not use Samba. The <server> is a Windows box not a Linux box
>>running Samba.
>>    
>>
>
>So? It's still the Server Message Block protocol. The SMB designation is
>equally appropriate to Windows and Samba servers. (or, perhaps I should say
>SaMBa servers :-)
>  
>
Viola! Setting smbntsec works! I just the usage of Samba instead of just 
SMB threw me. In any event, as it was said before, this should be noted 
in the FAQ.

(Wonder why this isn't on by default like ntsec...?)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -