Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3ED21307.4010101@yahoo.com.cn>
Date:	Mon, 26 May 2003 21:13:43 +0800
From:	Liu <shorthair_liu AT yahoo DOT com DOT cn>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313
X-Accept-Language:	zh-cn, en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: using syscall in cygwin?
References:	<20030524123851 DOT 34720 DOT qmail AT web15307 DOT mail DOT bjs DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030524175023 DOT GA6768 AT redhat DOT com> <3ED07063 DOT 5030600 AT yahoo DOT com DOT cn> <20030525083010 DOT GF19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20030525083010.GF19367@cygbert.vinschen.de>

I don't understand this well.
Thank you anyway. I will study it further.

Kai


> No.  In case of Cygwin the syscall *is* open().  Don't mess with it.
> N.B., there's no glibc involved at all.  Cygwin doesn't use glibc but
> newlib as std C lib.
> 
> Corinna
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -