Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<DF08E278E10FC14F87CE7E802ABFD04B039256BE@EXCHANGE01.air2web.com>
From:	Richard Campbell <richard DOT campbell AT air2web DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Re[2]: cat
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2003 15:40:07 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0

Igor,

I realized cat.exe versus cat wasn't guaranteed, and in fact 
grep/egrep/fgrep was exactly what I was thinking of when I 
suggested the declining usefulness of the package search if 
a search for "cat" was returning 197 hits.

I read your earlier message, but missed the bin/program suggestion
because of the ""bin/prog"" portion, which apparently
kicked me over the edge into scan mode (I remembered the "more has 
been around for a while" note, though...).

Mea Culpa.

-Richard Campbell.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -