Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2003 07:57:05 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [CYGWIN] Updated Cygwin Package: postgresql-7.3.2-2
In-reply-to:	<babl14$33f$1@main.gmane.org>
To:	Frank Seesink <frank AT mail DOT wvnet DOT edu>
Cc:	pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	Frank Seesink <frank AT mail DOT wvnet DOT edu>,
	pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20030520115705.GA1880@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
References:	<20030519195400 DOT GG1868 AT tishler DOT net> <babl14$33f$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>

Frank,

[Note redirected from cygwin-announce@ to cygwin@...]

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:16:37PM -0400, Frank Seesink wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >New News:
> >=== ====
> >This version is built against cygipc 1.14-1 which contains a fix to
> >properly handle Windows XP's Fast User Switching.  If interested, see
> >the following for the details:
> >
> >    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00282.html
> 
> Jason,
> 
> How version-specific is PostgreSQL under Cygwin with relation to
> CygIPC?

Somewhat.

> I mean, from the above, it seems that a fix in the latter requires a
> recompile of the former?

It depends.

> Or is that only in specific cases like this one with the Fast User
> Context Switching (FUCS)?

If the change is internal to ipc-daemon then no recompile of PostgreSQL
should be necessary.  On the other hand, if the change is in libcygipc.a,
then a recompile is necessary.

> [Acronym unintentional...but kind of amusing when I think about 
> it. :-) ]

Agreed.  Maybe the CKOA <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#CKOA> will add it
to the list.

> I only ask because I saw the updated CygIPC 1.14-1 this morning and 
> figured I'd test against it (with the same same PostgreSQL 7.3.2-1 
> that's been installed).  FYI:  PostgreSQL 7.3.2-1 behaves no differently 
> than before--initdb still fails if you use FUCS--but 'ipctest s' DOES 
> work even when logged in using FUCS, and PostgreSQL itself runs just fine.

The above is the expected behavior because the FUCS change is in
libcygipc.a (and ipc-daemon).

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -