Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date:	Sat, 17 May 2003 12:43:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	"Bill C. Riemers" <cygwin AT docbill DOT net>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Ajay Nerurkar <ajaynerurkar AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Top utility
In-Reply-To:	<004001c31c6f$52bcd340$6400a8c0@FoxtrotTech0001>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0305171241420.8930-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Importance:	Normal
MIME-Version:	1.0

Bill,

FYI, <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=bin%2Ftop.exe>
shows that "top" is part of the "procps" package (and the one Ajay
referred to as "the procps top").

On Sat, 17 May 2003, Bill C. Riemers wrote:

> I'm not sue which package it is distributed in, but when I type "top" under
> cygwin, it works as expected.  Only, like all "ps" type commands for cygwin,
> only cygwin processes are shown.
>                                                   Bill
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
> To: "Ajay Nerurkar" <ajaynerurkar AT yahoo DOT com>
> Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Top utility
>
> > On Fri, 16 May 2003, Ajay Nerurkar wrote:
> >
> > > I am interested in porting the code at http://www.groupsys.com/top/
> > > to Cygwin. (I know of the existence of the procps top.)
> > >
> > > Searching the archives I found that Igor's already done this
> > > (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01974.html). Igor, do you
> > > know if your port's been tested by anyone since then? I plan to use
> > > it as a starting point. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Ajay
> >
> > Ajay,
> >
> > Mine was more of a quick hack to make it compile than a port.  See
> > <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg02173.html>.  If you look through
> > the replies to the message you referenced above, you'll see all the people
> > who tested the code, AFAIK.  Also, Chris January (the implementor of the
> > /proc filesystem for Cygwin) said that he posted a patch to make this top
> > work correctly -- you might want to investigate that.
> > 	Igor

-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -