Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3EC4D2D8.3000708@terrasys.de>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2003 14:00:24 +0200
From:	"Peter L. Smilde" <smilde AT terrasys DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language:	de, en-us, en, nl
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Signatures for binary packages
X-Enigmail-Version:	0.65.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports:	pgp-inline, pgp-mime

Hi,

According to the gnupg anouncement of November, the source-code package 
of gnupg contains signature files for several of its parts. Are there 
also signature files available for the binary packages?

Alternatively checksums can be used. But the checksums contained in the 
packages are only good for checking the data transfer; for security 
checking the checksums should be published independently.

Regards,

Peter

-- 

Peter L. Smilde
smilde at terrasys dot de




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -