Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2003 21:52:20 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin B20 won't run any executable that doesn't have a .exe extension
Message-ID:	<20030516015220.GC14269@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1C63B6BC1CF8BF408FCED3B2D202C58E0120BD77 AT arch-hr DOT mel DOT dbce DOT csiro DOT au> <005101c31b45$55322970$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<005101c31b45$55322970$78d96f83@pomello>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:51:48AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>David DOT Paterson AT csiro DOT au wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Cygwin B20 comes bundled with CFX-4.4. I tried upgrading to Cygwin
>1.3.22-1
>> without success. What I need now is the name of the correct pieces to
>> upgrade.
>
>Cygwin B20 is ancient - So ancient, that you cannot upgrade, you must do a
>clean install of the current Cygwin.
>
>
>Is CFX really commercial software? (The website seems to suggest so).
>Did Red Hat do commercial licensing of B20?

No.  Never.  The commercial licenses were either called GNUpro or Cygwin 1.0.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -