Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: /proc/meminfo - swap question
References:	<20030515104428 DOT GN19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
From:	Roman Belenov <rbelenov AT yandex DOT ru>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2003 15:06:04 +0400
In-Reply-To:	<20030515104428.GN19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> (Corinna
	Vinschen's message of "Thu, 15 May 2003 14:44:28 +0400")
Message-ID:	<uy918fp0j.fsf@yandex.ru>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (windows-nt)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> writes:

> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0700, linda w (cyg) wrote:
>> /proc/meminfo reports:
>> >          total:      used:      free:
>> > Mem:   536305664  339480576  196825088
>> > Swap: 1043218432  283000832  760217600
>> > 	Thing is, my swapfile is 512M (physmem=512M).  So instead
>> > of 'swap' and 'mem', shouldn't those fields be labeled virtual and
>> > physical memory?
>
> These are the same names used by Linux /proc/meminfo.

But the meaning is different; IMHO the values should fixed to be
Linux-compatible.

-- 
 							With regards, Roman.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -