Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/05/10/04:30:02
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 06:10:19PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> key_t, as it's used for ipc, is likely to be *problematic* to transition
> in a 'fat binary' style.
>
> You'd need a 32 bit set of key creation routines, and and translation
> table to lookup 32bit keys in the list of 64 bit keys ....
>
> Given that cygipc is *not* in cygwin today, and you'd be adding it, I'd
> simply have it 64 bit from the first release uploaded to sources.
>
> And I'd time that for oh, a day after cygwin 1.5 goes up as a testing
> package. (And release cygipc as testing whilst cygwin 1.5 stays in
> testing).
Is there actually a need to convert key_t to 64 bit?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -