Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/05/09/18:47:07
On Fri, 9 May 2003 lists AT m8y DOT org wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
> > AC,.
> >
> > At 15:18 2003-05-09, lists AT m8y DOT org wrote:
> > >On Fri, 9 May 2003, Winston Gutkowski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Don't want to flog a dead horse, but if I read the manpages right
> > > > it seems that
> > > > -222
> > > > should be true only if the 'w' flag is on in all 3 positions, but
> > > > +222
> > > > will be true only if the 'w' flag is on in *any* of the 3 positions.
> > > >
> > > > Is this right? Also, I didn't find any refernce to the shorthand
> > > +2. Perhaps it's one of those mystical osmosis things...:-)
> >
> > Winston. You're right. There is no such thing in GNU find.
> >
> > > > My reading of the manual is that:
> > > > -222 examines bit 2 being on in all of the 3 areas
> > > > +2 examines bit 2 being on in all of the 3 areas
> > > > 222 checks exact permissions 222
> > >
> > >Erm.
> > > +2 examines bit 2 being on in all of the 3 areas
> > >should read
> > > +2 examines bit 2 being on in any of the 3 areas
> >
> > There is no such shorthand (documented). "-perm +2" will only match
> > when the other / world write bit is set. It will not mach when the
> > owner and / or group write bits are set and the other / world write bit
> > is not. And so on, as my previous experiment showed.
> >
> > Maybe you're thinking of a some other find--a non GNU version?
>
> Stand corrected.
> P'raps this thread can die. :)
Le cheval est mort, vive le cheval! :-D
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -