Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/05/09/17:39:43
Randall,
I was not providing the correct way to solve the original problem, I was
correcting Winston's statement that you needed a separate script.
Personally, I'd use the -perm invocation in this particular case...
Igor
P.S. Bug? What bug? ;-)
On Fri, 9 May 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Igor,
>
> At 14:22 2003-05-09, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Winston,
> >
> >Most of this is off-topic, but why not simply
> >
> >find <dir> -type f -exec test -w {} \; -print
> >
> >?
> >Or, if you want something more complex,
> >
> >find <dir> -type f -exec sh -c "test -w {} && echo {}" \;
>
> It should be noted that the overhead of this will be pretty high,
> especially considering how little real work is being done in "-exec"
> task. If the number of files to examine is at all large, working out
> the correct self-contained find incantation is quite likely worth the
> cognitive effort.
>
> Also, on the offhand chance that there is a bug lurking somewhere here,
> it would be good to flush it out.
>
> Randall Schulz
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -