Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 8 May 2003 10:43:52 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: New package: rpm-4.1-1
Message-ID:	<20030508144352.GA28962@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030506161952 DOT A30179 AT ns DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3EB9F82B DOT 5000605 AT linuxforum DOT net> <20030507235738 DOT C24620 AT ns DOT helixdigital DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030507235738.C24620@ns.helixdigital.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:57:38PM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote:
>On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:24:43PM +0800, David Huang wrote:
>
>> I have installed rpm, rpm-build and rpm-doc from net releases, but
>> I can't find /usr/include/rpm*.h and /usr/lib/lib*. Dose it miss a
>> package rpm-devel? And looks like librpm, librpmbuild, librpmio and
>> librpmdb were built in static lib format, why not buld them in DLL
>> format? The .exe files are too big.
>
>Yes, you're correct; I've put off an rpm-devel package until I can build
>shared library versions of the RPM libraries, and that should happen in
>the next few weeks, although I can't promise anything.

If we're missing header files are we still GPL compliant or isn't RPM GPLed?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -