Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 08 May 2003 09:52:18 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved!
In-reply-to:	<3EB9A54B.8060500@ece.gatech.edu>
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20030508135217.GD512@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
References:	<20030506174725 DOT GE1652 AT tishler DOT net>
	<3EB84F52 DOT 3020608 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030507133326 DOT GA1824 AT tishler DOT net>
	<3EB9A54B DOT 8060500 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Chuck,

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:31:07PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> I think this needs to be a runtime function, not a compiletime macro.

Given Igor's validation, improvements, and corrections of/to my patch,
do you still want a runtime function approach?  Or, is the (ugly and
possibly performance affecting) macro approach OK?

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -