Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/05/07/17:44:25
This sounds a lot like this topic described here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-12/msg00690.html
My recollection is that rsync 2.5.6 didn't get the
cygwin patches for buffering applied, sigh.
Look here:
http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/#dirlist
for the code base and here:
http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/patches/craigb-perf.diff?rev=1.1
for the buffering patches.
Since this file:
http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/fileio.c
still appears unpatched, this suggests that the
performance patches for cygwin still have not been
applied to the code base.
If you want to try out the version that I use with
the buffering patches, you can get it here:
http://www.kleckner.net/rsync.tgz
I'll leave it there for a month or so.
Good luck - Jim
Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We have strange problem with rsync performance.
>
> We do files syncronization from w2k (cygwin, rsync 2.5.6) over ssh to
> Linux (rsync 2.5.5).
>
> We have several 10Mb files.
> First time, when directory on Linux is empty, all looks OK-
> syncronization takes about 10 minites.
> But when we try to do this second time, i.e. with files on Linux and
> windows, synconization takes more than 10
> minites for _file_ !
> And, ssh process on windows eats about 90% of cpu
> Any ideas?
>
> btw, certanly, linux-linux works ok in the same situation.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -