Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3EB975CA.90905@lapo.it>
Date:	Wed, 07 May 2003 23:08:26 +0200
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030503
X-Accept-Language:	it, en, fr, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin's exit status / errorlevel
References:	<3EB85657 DOT 2040406 AT lapo DOT it> <20030507015801 DOT GG10709 AT redhat DOT com> <3EB8B535 DOT 3030303 AT lapo DOT it> <20030507141558 DOT GC26264 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20030507141558.GC26264@redhat.com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>>I was mainly referring to the strangeness that windows errorlevel is set 
>>correct but executing from Mozilla does not... anyway, I guess enigmail 
>>people should continue on their "let's convert any 256 errorcode to 2 
>>and assume it is cygwin's fault".
>>    
>>
>Yeah, it's cygwin's "fault" for assuming that it should be compliant
>with UNIX.
>
I didn't meant that...
well, anyway.

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -