Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To:	"Cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Compile times in Windows
Date:	Mon, 5 May 2003 22:53:11 +0100
Message-ID:	<ICEBIHGCEJIPLNMBNCMKIEIHCFAA.chris@atomice.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
In-Reply-To:	<01bc01c3132c$0782b080$4aa907d5@BRAMSCHE>
Importance:	Normal

> > Have you tried/looked at ccache?
> >
> Some time ago I had done some tests with ccache compiling KDE-cygwin, but
> contrary to my expectations I recognized a slowdown of compiling
> speed. This let
> me assume, that the file/path accessing is the real bottleneck.
>
> Does anyone have got similar experience ?
I've never really noticed any perceivable advantage to using ccache
personally.

On the other hand, distcc works with Cygwin!

Chris


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -