delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <000b01c31318$f13a52a0$0601040a@jbaker1200> |
From: | "Jeff Baker" <jbaker AT qnx DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Compile times in Windows |
Date: | Mon, 5 May 2003 11:13:49 -0400 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3718.0 |
I know this question is somewhat vague, but that's how it was presented to me so that's what I have to start with. I've been asked to find a way to make gcc and the binutils faster in Windows ( Cygwin ). Before I get down to the level of profiling the code I thought I'd ask if there are any compile time options I may not be aware of that might speed the works up a little. For the record I've already sent this question to the binutils mailing list as well. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |