Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Chris Jefferson" <caj AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	g++ newer version
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2003 14:24:21 +0100
Message-ID:	<OGEGLEMELABNDJILEGAIEEACCAAA.caj@cs.york.ac.uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Scanner:	exiscan *19BE0d-0000BM-00*J19g.MSjHP.*

Hello!

I'm really sorry because I suspect this is a FAQ..

I have a c program which shows up a bug in the current cygwin gcc and g++
compilers

( http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=8639 if
anyone is interested). It is fixed in 3.2.2 and above

How long is it likely to be before 3.2.2 or 3.2.3 get merged into cygwin? Is
it a difficult task or just a case of only doing it when it seems worth it?

Chris


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -