Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<000d01c30f9e$7505a720$5f6886d9@ellixia>
From:	"Elfyn McBratney" <elfyn-cygwin AT exposure DOT org DOT uk>
To:	"cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Joshua Kwan" <joshk AT triplehelix DOT org>
References:	<20030501042813 DOT GA15911 AT triplehelix DOT org>
Subject:	Re: basename() implementation?
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2003 05:59:32 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

> I've read the archive and apparently there is a basename function
> floating around *somewhere* in cygwin. But what header should I use and
> what header should I link against to use it?
>
> BTW, I'm using libtool now so *supposedly* building shlibs are fixed.

Josh, thank you for reminding me to get off my...! {base,dir}name() are not
yet implemented, however they should be in the next release

> Also, I would like to know why the libtool.m4 for cygwin fancies looking
> for a fortran compiler in configure! It's totally nonsensical to me, can
> anyone clear this up or tell me how to get rid of it? There is *no*
> fortran code in my project.
>
> Regards,
> Josh

It shouldn't matter, anyhow IIRC there's an autoconf macro to disable
looking for the (a) fortan compiler.

Elfyn


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -