Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/04/30/11:52:20
On Thu, 1 May 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> > (*) Personally, I think perl support in vim would be nice, but I'm
> > absolutely against adding a perl dependence to the vim package. There's
> > no reason to drag in yet another 6.5M of stuff if all I want is an editor.
> > If that were desirable, I'd just install emacs.
>
> if 'all i want is an editor' then why get vim at all.
> ;)
>
> Gareth - no bias here, move along, nothing to see.
Because the "cat/sed" combination is much harder to use :)
On second thought, make that a "visual editor"...
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -