Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:25:48 +0100 (BST)
From:	andrew brian clegg <a DOT clegg AT mail DOT cryst DOT bbk DOT ac DOT uk>
X-X-Sender:	fcleg01 AT sark DOT cryst DOT bbk DOT ac DOT uk
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
In-Reply-To:	<20030430083411.GR19711@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0304301522370.12281-100000@sark.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner-Information:	Please contact CCSG (http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/CCSG/) more information
X-MailScanner-cryst-bbk:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck:	not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-17.8, required 10,
	BAYES_00, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	USER_AGENT_PINE)

> === cut here ===
> 
> [ ]  Yes, please add perl support to the next Cygwin vim release.
> 
> [X]  No, go away with that.
> 
> [ ]  What's vim?
> 
> === cut here ===

My first thought was "yeah, that'd be cool" but on reflection I'm with 
whoever said that people who would be happy using Perl from within vim 
ought to be clueful enough to compile it in for themselves.

I think it was the joke about vim making Emacs look lightweight that made 
me stop and think...

Andrew.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -