Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3EAFCEE2.3040406@netscape.net>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:25:54 -0400
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT netscape DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	"Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
References:	<20030430083411 DOT GR19711 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
X-Enigmail-Version:	0.74.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports:	pgp-inline, pgp-mime

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[SNIP]
=== cut here ===

[ ]  Yes, please add perl support to the next Cygwin vim release.

[X]  No, go away with that.

[ ]  What's vim?

=== cut here ===

Corinna,

I'd love to see a perl-enabled vim, however the requirement for 
perl-5.8.0 will not work for me.  As you are aware, perl-5.8.0 is *not* 
working at all on WinME.  Thus, I cannot have my beloved vim require me 
to install a broken perl on my machine.  I'm trying to debug why 
perl-5.8.0 is broken, but still haven't discovered any conclusive evidence.

I don't know if Pierre uses vim, but if he does it is likely to bite him 
as well if this happens.

Is there no way to make this modular?  Or perhaps offer two types of vim 
installs (like emacs-nox & emacs)?

Cheers,
Nicholas


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -