Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
References:	<20030430083411 DOT GR19711 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20030430094847 DOT GE52453 AT justpickone DOT org>
	<20030430100121 DOT GV19711 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<871xzkkxqs DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower>
	<20030430115812 DOT GY19711 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Organization:	Jan at Appel
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	30 Apr 2003 14:19:14 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20030430115812.GY19711@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Message-ID:	<87llxsjhz1.fsf@peder.flower>
Lines:	21
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50
MIME-Version:	1.0

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> writes:

> Apparently we're using different Linuces ;-)

Oh no, how did that happen?  Fragmentation BAD.  Single vendor GOOD.  :-)

I Forgot to vote, btw:

    [ ]  Yes, please add perl support to the next Cygwin vim release.

    [X]  No, go away with that
    
    [ ]  What's vim?

... at least until there's an(other/dditional) lightweight VI package.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -