Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<006701c30e43$07449a40$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT connect DOT to>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<b8ln2c$865$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
Subject:	Re: gcc version : 3.2 or 3.2-3 ?
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:32:34 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

Alex Vinokur wrote:
> gcc -v indicate version 3.2 but not 3.2-3 (!?)

Ugh, this is becoming a FAQ.

3.2-3 means VERSION = 3.2, CYGWIN-SPECIFIC-RELEASE = 3

No packaging system that I know of attempts to insert its release number
into the version output of executables.

This issue has been mention on this list very recently.



Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -