Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/04/25/19:52:16
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>> Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.
>>>
>>> But I would appreciate testing and feedback. This is an update to
>>> version 1.11.5 from 1.11.0; there have been lots of changes under the
>>> hood. cvs-1.11.5 adds the rlog command, as well as a number of
>>> bugfixes. AFAIK, the server mode is still broken.
>>
>> ....
>>
>>
>>> remote: crerepos
>>> ERROR: cannot test remote CVS, because `rsh KHELDAR' fails.
>>> when testing in remote mode, crerepos uses :ext: instead of
>>> :fork:. However, even though I had rshd running -- it was
>>> running as SYSTEM -- which means password entry is required.
>>> This test expects passwordless rsh.
>>
>>
>> This works if you set up passwordless ssh back to your own machine and
set
>> the envvars to point cvs at ssh rather than rsh.
>
> Right -- but "passwordless" ssh means that the sshd must be running as
> the user you want to log in as. I was running sshd under SYSTEM...so no
> luck there.
Passphraseless pubkey auth works just fine with sshd as SYSTEM.
> But you note that this is NOT a cvs server -- it's really logging in to
> the "remote" machine via ssh and running cvs "on the 'server'". cvs
> itself is not listening for incoming connections.
Oops... now I see how my snippage could have caused confusion. I just left
in the stuff at the top for basic context. I just wanted to say that the
remote crerepos test will pass if it has the right support. I wasn't
thinking about server mode.
----
Sorry about all this below:
>> Also, a couple of packaging points:
>>
>> - I don't think re-autotooling was necessary.
>>
>> - Your port notes in the README don't mention the change from gdbm to
>> flat-file.
>
> I did not change from gdbm to flat file -- at least not on purpose. In
> fact, I added a lot of configury code to enable linkage to gdbm. So
> your comment that "re autotooling was [not] necessary" is nonsense -- I
> modified configure.in and at least one Makefile.am -- of COURSE I had to
> reautotool.
>
>> So, this is basically stock 1.11.5, which I have been using for my
>> day-to-day cvs-ing for months.
>
> No, after removing the autotool detritus, the patch is still 27k, and
> touches the following files:
...
> It's definitely NOT stock, unless I screwed up.
It seems 'lsdiff' screwed up:
$ lsdiff cvs-1.11.5-1.patch
cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/cvs.README
cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh
cvs-1.11.5/CYGWIN-PATCHES/setup.hint
cvs-1.11.5/Makefile.in
cvs-1.11.5/aclocal.m4
cvs-1.11.5/config.h.in
cvs-1.11.5/configure
$
Whereas fgrep '+++' shows the truth.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -