Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<001101c30917$fbf597a0$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Peter S Tillier" <petert AT eq1152 DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>,
	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<000201c30915$dcf96180$5c16989e AT oemcomputer>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin patch numbers
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:41:51 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Peter S Tillier wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I notice that the Cygwin developers use a standard naming convention for
> the packages containing, for example gawk and sed.  This convention is
> based upon the tool's version number and various patch levels, such as:
>
>  gawk-3.1.2-2.tar.bz2
>
> However when gawk --version is executed the version number only displays
> as 3.1.2 (the GNU awk version/patch number).  Would it be possible for
> the Cygwin patch number (the -2 above) to be included in the version
> number for each tool/package please?

I doubt that most Cygwin package maintainers are going to hunt out version
strings and change them - especially since this part of a patch would cause
a conflict every time they started work on a new version.

In any case:

$ cygcheck -c gawk
Cygwin Package Information
Package              Version
gawk                 3.1.2-2

Use -h to see help about each section
$



Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -