Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Rolf Campbell <rcampbell AT tropicnetworks DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Is Cygwin really required?
Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:24:56 -0400
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<b7us4r$bcb$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<Xns9361B766BBBBAlucianoavgmxnet AT 80 DOT 91 DOT 224 DOT 249>
Reply-To:	IDontLikePersonalReplies AT hotmail DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
In-Reply-To:	<Xns9361B766BBBBAlucianoavgmxnet@80.91.224.249>

Luciano wrote:
> So, sed 4.0.7 for Win32 has just seen the light of day, with a few 
> bug fixes. Cygwin currently uses 4.0.5. Can I just drop in the new 
> Win32 version in my /bin directory, or do I have to wait for an ad 
> hoc Cygwin port? Apparently, these programs we use are linked to 
> Cygwin1.dll somehow...
> 
> Countless thanks,
> 
The Win32 version will not support posix paths.  But, other than that, 
it should still work fine.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -