Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-envelope-info:	<rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Message-Id:	<5.2.1.1.2.20030417205149.00fee6b0@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:53:03 -0700
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin Volunteers (WAS: Re: A request?)
In-Reply-To:	<b7ns20$jhu$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<20030417172623 DOT GB12623 AT redhat DOT com>
	<768A0EA6FF8CB34FA522978966E5D52E021370A9 AT bwam02msx DOT ae DOT ge DOT com>
	<20030417172623 DOT GB12623 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Rolf,


At 20:40 2003-04-17, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>...
>
>Could the w32api source be bundled into the source package so we(the 
>royal we) don't have to download some arbitrary version of w32api, and 
>then do some renaming and moving?


What's wrong with <http://www.cygwin.com/packages/w32api/>?

Randall Schulz 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -